When Should You Return to Social Media After Rhinoplasty?
Returning to social media after rhinoplasty should be evaluated based on the rhinoplasty recovery process, swelling, psychological readiness...
In recent years, I have been seeing a growing group of patients who have lost a significant amount of weight. They move more easily, their clothes fit differently, they feel healthier metabolically, and they are often very pleased with their weight loss.
But when they look in the mirror, something else catches their attention:
Today, this appearance is often called “Ozempic face” on social media. But there is an important problem with that term. These changes did not begin with Ozempic. Long before weight-loss injections became widely used, we were already seeing very similar changes in the face and neck of patients who had lost substantial amounts of weight after bariatric surgery.
Perhaps what we should really be discussing is not “Ozempic face,” but facial changes after major weight loss. Your face does not know how you lost the weight. When explaining this to my patients, I try to keep it as simple as possible.
Your face does not know whether you lost weight through:
sleeve gastrectomy,
gastric bypass,
Mounjaro,
Wegovy,
or Saxenda.
The method itself is not what your face recognises.
What matters to your face is something else:
These factors largely determine the changes we see in the face. That is why, when assessing these patients, I first try to understand how the face has changed rather than focusing on the name of the medication or surgical procedure. We have actually known this for years from our experience with bariatric surgery patients.
Research documenting changes in facial appearance after substantial weight loss following bariatric surgery is not new. The literature describes reduced midfacial volume, hollowing of the cheeks, more pronounced nasolabial folds, and loose skin around the neck. Some studies have also shown that patients may be perceived as older after major weight loss.
This teaches us something important: while losing weight can be extremely beneficial for health, the aesthetic changes in the face do not always follow the same positive direction. A person may feel much better about their body while their face begins to look more tired in the mirror. In my experience, this is often where the patient's main concern begins.
Facial fat should not be thought of simply as excess tissue.
Facial fat also:
With significant weight loss, these fat compartments may lose volume.
As a result:
In fact, in some patients, weight loss does not create entirely new sagging. Instead, it reveals laxity that was previously concealed by facial volume. This is an important distinction.

There is considerable overlap in their effects on the face. Both can lead to a reduction in facial volume following substantial weight loss. However, the two situations are not entirely identical.
Patients who begin at a higher body weight may experience very substantial overall weight loss.
Consequently, changes in the face and neck such as:
volume loss,
excess skin,
and tissue sagging
may be more dramatic.
However, there is another important factor we need to assess in patients who have undergone surgery:
Nutritional status. Following bariatric surgery, particularly procedures involving a greater degree of malabsorption, deficiencies in iron, folate, vitamin B12, vitamin D, zinc, copper, and other micronutrients may occur. Inadequate protein intake and loss of lean body mass can also be important concerns for some patients. Current guidelines therefore recommend regular monitoring for nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery.
For this reason, when considering facial or neck surgery for a patient who has undergone bariatric surgery, it is not enough to ask only:
“How much weight have you lost?”
We need to look beyond that question.
I also want to know:
These are equally important questions. Planning a good surgical procedure matters, but so does making sure the body is in a condition that supports proper tissue healing.

GLP-1 and GLP-1/GIP-based medications do not anatomically alter the gastrointestinal tract in the way bariatric surgery does.
Therefore, they do not cause the type of surgically induced malabsorption that may occur after gastric bypass.
However:
“No malabsorption” does not mean “nutrition does not matter.” When appetite is greatly reduced, weight loss is rapid, protein intake is low, and physical activity is insufficient, lean body mass may decrease along with fat mass. That is why, in patients using weight-loss medications, I do not look only at facial fat; I also assess their overall tissue reserves. Which approach makes the face look older? There is no single answer. Historically, we associated the most dramatic facial and neck changes with bariatric surgery because that was where we most often saw very large reductions in weight. However, modern weight-loss medications now make substantial weight loss possible without surgery. As a result, the differences between these two groups are becoming less distinct.
For me, the more useful question is:
For example, a face that has lost 20 kilograms does not know whether that weight was lost after sleeve gastrectomy or during tirzepatide treatment.
What the face shows us is how much volume has been lost, how well the skin has contracted, how far the tissues have descended, and how the natural ageing process has interacted with these changes.
Does every hollow face need filler? No. I believe this is one of the most important messages on this subject. When we see facial volume loss, our first instinct may be to “replace the missing volume.” Sometimes that really is the right approach. But not always.
There may be three different problems in the face:
1. Volume Loss
In this case, carefully selected filler treatments or volume restoration using the patient's own fat may be helpful.
2. Reduced Skin Quality
Here, skin-care strategies and appropriately selected energy-based treatments may be considered.
3. Downward Movement of the Tissues
In this case, missing volume is not the only problem.
The cheeks may have descended, the jawline may have lost definition, and the neck may have become loose. Repeatedly adding volume to such a face can sometimes make it look heavier rather than younger. This is where surgical assessment becomes important.
In some respects, yes.
In patients who have experienced very significant weight loss, laxity may be more widespread across the face and neck.
Therefore, rather than simply tightening the skin, we may need to consider:
repositioning the tissues,
restoring the neck contour,
and, when necessary, replacing lost volume using the patient's own fat
as part of the same treatment plan. In these patients, I pay particular attention to distinguishing volume loss from tissue sagging because they are not the same problem. One may require the addition of volume; the other may require repositioning the tissues. Some patients need both.

If a patient's weight is still falling rapidly, I prefer not to rush into major aesthetic decisions. The reason is simple: we do not want to operate on a moving target. A face treated today may change again if the patient loses another 8–10 kilograms over the following months.
For patients considering surgery in particular, it is valuable to ensure:
that their weight is reasonably stable,
that their overall health is good,
and that their nutritional status is adequate.
These factors can improve the predictability of the outcome and support safe healing. We are not trying to recreate the old face. I believe there is also an important psychological aspect to facial rejuvenation after major weight loss. Patients often show us an old photograph and say, “This is what I used to look like.” But they no longer have the same body, the same fat distribution, or perhaps even the same age. Therefore, our goal should not always be to reproduce the old face exactly. I see it differently: the aim is to create a new facial balance that is harmonious with the patient's new body. That is a much more natural goal.
I believe so.
“Ozempic face” is a memorable social media term.
But from a medical perspective, it places too much emphasis on one particular medication.
We can see the same changes in people who have lost substantial weight through:
bariatric surgery,
intensive dieting,
GLP-1 medications,
GLP-1/GIP treatments,
or other causes of significant weight loss.
That is why I prefer a broader term: “weight-loss face,” meaning facial changes after significant weight loss. The key issue is not the brand of medication. It is the biological process of change itself.
When a patient comes to me after major weight loss, I start with four questions:
If the patient has undergone bariatric surgery, I also assess their nutritional status.
What I believe is wrong is recommending a treatment automatically based on the method the patient used to lose weight. We are not treating the medication or the bariatric procedure. We are treating the face in front of us.
In Summary
Bariatric surgery and weight-loss injections are different types of treatment. Yet many of the facial changes seen after them may stem from the same biological process:
My approach is to allow the weight-loss process to stabilise, then understand exactly what the face has lost, and treat only the remaining problem. Because your face does not know how you lost the weight, but it clearly shows us what has changed.
Prof. Dr. Tevfik Sözen
ENT, Ankara
Returning to social media after rhinoplasty should be evaluated based on the rhinoplasty recovery process, swelling, psychological readiness...
Nasal deviation, septum deviation, and breathing problems should be evaluated together with nasal congestion, snoring, and treatment options...
With septorhinoplasty, nasal deviation and aesthetic concerns can be corrected in a single session. Breathe more comfortably and achieve a n...